Login to your account

Username *
Password *
Remember Me

Blog With Right Sidebar

Sublingual immunotherapy: World Allergy Organization position paper 2013 update.

Related Articles

We have prepared this document, "Sublingual Immunotherapy: World Allergy Organization Position Paper 2013 Update", according to the evidence-based criteria, revising and updating chapters of the originally published paper, "Sublingual Immunotherapy: World Allergy Organization Position Paper 2009", available here. Namely, these comprise: "Mechanisms of sublingual immunotherapy;" "Clinical efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy" - reporting all the data of all controlled trials published after 2009; "Safety of sublingual immunotherapy" - with the recently published Grading System for adverse reactions; "Impact of sublingual immunotherapy on the natural history of respiratory allergy" - with the relevant evidences published since 2009; "Efficacy of SLIT in children" - with detailed analysis of all the studies; "Definition of SLIT patient selection" - reporting the criteria for eligibility to sublingual immunotherapy; "The future of immunotherapy in the community care setting"; "Methodology of clinical trials according to the current scientific and regulatory standards"; and "Guideline development: from evidence-based medicine to patients' views" - including the evolution of the methods to make clinical recommendations.Additionally, we have added new chapters to cover a few emerging crucial topics: "Practical aspects of schedules and dosages and counseling for adherence" - which is crucial in clinical practice for all treatments; "Perspectives and new approaches" - including recombinant allergens, adjuvants, modified allergens, and the concept of validity of the single products. Furthermore, "Raising public awareness about sublingual immunotherapy", as a need for our patients, and strategies to increase awareness of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) among patients, the medical community, all healthcare stakeholders, and public opinion, are also reported in detail.

The challenge of treating preschool wheezing episodes: The need for evidence-based approaches

Young children with intermittent wheezing have substantial disease morbidity, particularly related to acute exacerbations. In the June 2013 issue of the Journal, we presented the results of post hoc analyses of 2 clinical trials conducted by the Childhood Asthma Research and Education Network on the effect of oral corticosteroids (OCSs) on episode severity in young children with intermittent wheezing. With due diligence given to the limitations of post hoc analyses, we presented data suggesting that OCSs did not reduce symptom severity during acute outpatient lower respiratory tract illnesses in preschool children with recurrent wheeze. Furthermore, we did not recommend abandonment of this therapeutic approach but rather suggested that our findings should serve as a note of caution and be followed by further prospective trials. These conclusions were supported by the accompanying editorial by Dr Gergen. In this issue of the Journal, Dr Weinberger presents an additional editorial expressing concerns with our findings and conclusions, which he describes as “nihilistic” and contradictory to his personal experience.

Advances in basic and clinical immunology in 2013

A significant number of contributions to our understanding of primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment were published in the Journal in 2013. For example, deficiency of mast cell degranulation caused by signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 deficiency was demonstrated to contribute to the difference in the frequency of severe allergic reactions in patients with autosomal dominant hyper-IgE syndrome compared with that seen in atopic subjects with similar high IgE serum levels. High levels of nonglycosylated IgA were found in patients with Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome, and these abnormal antibodies might contribute to the nephropathy seen in these patients. New described genes causing immunodeficiency included caspase recruitment domain 11 (CARD11), mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue 1 (MALT1) for combined immunodeficiencies, and tetratricopeptide repeat domain 7A (TTC7A) for mutations associated with multiple atresia with combined immunodeficiency. Other observations expand the spectrum of clinical presentation of specific gene defects (eg, adult-onset idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia and early-onset autoimmunity might be due to hypomorphic mutations of the recombination-activating genes). Newborn screening in California established the incidence of severe combined immunodeficiency at 1 in 66,250 live births. The use of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for PIDs was reviewed, with recommendations to give priority to research oriented to establish the best regimens to improve the safety and efficacy of bone marrow transplantation. These represent only a fraction of significant research done in patients with PIDs that has accelerated the quality of care of these patients. Genetic analysis of patients has demonstrated multiple phenotypic expressions of immune deficiency in patients with nearly identical genotypes, suggesting that additional genetic factors, possibly gene dosage, or environmental factors are responsible for this diversity.

Sputum gene expression signature of 6 biomarkers discriminates asthma inflammatory phenotypes

Background: Airway inflammation is associated with asthma exacerbation risk, treatment response, and disease mechanisms.Objective: This study aimed to identify and validate a sputum gene expression signature that discriminates asthma inflammatory phenotypes.Methods: An asthma phenotype biomarker discovery study generated gene expression profiles from induced sputum of 47 asthmatic patients. A clinical validation study (n = 59 asthmatic patients) confirmed differential expression of key genes. A 6-gene signature was identified and evaluated for reproducibility (n = 30 asthmatic patients and n = 20 control subjects) and prediction of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) response (n = 71 asthmatic patients). Receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated, and area under the curve (AUC) values were reported.Results: From 277 differentially expressed genes between asthma inflammatory phenotypes, we identified 23 genes that showed highly significant differential expression in both the discovery and validation populations. A signature of 6 genes, including Charcot-Leydon crystal protein (CLC); carboxypeptidase A3 (CPA3); deoxyribonuclease I-like 3 (DNASE1L3); IL-1β (IL1B); alkaline phosphatase, tissue-nonspecific isozyme (ALPL); and chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 2 (CXCR2), was reproducible and could significantly (P < .0001) discriminate eosinophilic asthma from other phenotypes, including patients with noneosinophilic asthma (AUC, 89.6%), paucigranulocytic asthma (AUC, 92.6%), or neutrophilic asthma (AUC, 91.4%) and healthy control subjects (AUC, 97.6%), as well as discriminating patients with neutrophilic asthma from those with paucigranulocytic asthma (AUC, 85.7%) and healthy control subjects (AUC, 90.8). The 6-gene signature predicted ICS response (>12% change in FEV1; AUC, 91.5%). ICS treatment reduced the expression of CLC, CPA3, and DNASE1L3 in patients with eosinophilic asthma.Conclusions: A sputum gene expression signature of 6 biomarkers reproducibly and significantly discriminates inflammatory phenotypes of asthma and predicts ICS treatment response. This signature has the potential to become a useful diagnostic tool to assist in the clinical diagnosis and management of asthma.

Recommendations for live viral and bacterial vaccines in immunodeficient patients and their close contacts

The present uncertainty of which live viral or bacterial vaccines can be given to immunodeficient patients and the growing neglect of societal adherence to routine immunizations has prompted the Medical Advisory Committee of the Immune Deficiency Foundation to issue recommendations based on published literature and the collective experience of the committee members. These recommendations address the concern for immunodeficient patients acquiring infections from healthy subjects who have not been immunized or who are shedding live vaccine–derived viral or bacterial organisms. Such transmission of infectious agents can occur within the hospital, clinic, or home or at any public gathering. Collectively, we define this type of transmission as close-contact spread of infectious disease that is particularly relevant in patients with impaired immunity who might have an infection when exposed to subjects carrying vaccine-preventable infectious diseases or who have recently received a live vaccine. Immunodeficient patients who have received therapeutic hematopoietic stem transplantation are also at risk during the time when immune reconstitution is incomplete or while they are receiving immunosuppressive agents to prevent or treat graft-versus-host disease. This review recommends the general education of what is known about vaccine-preventable or vaccine-derived diseases being spread to immunodeficient patients at risk for close-contact spread of infection and describes the relative risks for a child with severe immunodeficiency. The review also recommends a balance between the need to protect vulnerable subjects and their social needs to integrate into society, attend school, and benefit from peer education.

Search