Login to your account

Username *
Password *
Remember Me

Blog With Right Sidebar

Prophylactic cranial irradiation in non-small cell lung cancer patients: who might be the candidates?

Brain metastases (BMs) often advance the course of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We performed an observational study in order to investigate the possible correlation of selected clinical and epidemiological factors with BM appearance in patients suffering from different histological subtypes of NSCLC stage I-IV.

METHODS: The study included 161 consecutive patients with NSCLC. Analyzed data included patient- and tumor-related characteristics.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients (24.2%) presented BMs within 12 (0-36) weeks of diagnosis. BMs decreased the mean overall survival significantly (15.6 versus 50.7 weeks, P < 0.001), with hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) 3.60 (2.42-5.35). The age of the patients with BM was significantly lower than that of the patients without BM (60.8 ± 8.9 versus 66.5 ± 8.5, P < 0.001). Patients with BM had significantly higher pack-years consumption (75.9 ± 23.9 versus 58.9 ± 31.9, P = 0.003) and larger tumor size compared with patients without BM (size in mm: 55.1 ± 20.1 versus 45.9 ± 19.3, P = 0.012). The presence of BM was also correlated with the absence of lung (P < 0.001), bone (P = 0.005), and adrenal (P = 0.046) metastases.
CONCLUSION: Younger NSCLC patients with high tobacco consumption, large tumor size, and absence of metastases in other organs (lung, bones, adrenal metastases) are at high risk of BM appearance during the course of NSCLC and are candidates for prophylactic cranial irradiation early in the course of the disease.

Evaluation and management of chronic pulmonary thromboembolic disease.

Evaluation and management of chronic pulmonary thromboembolic disease.

Hosp Pract (Minneap). 2011 Aug;39(3):50-61

Authors: Mendoza V, Scharf ML

Abstract
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is common and the majority of patients survive the acute event. Survivors are at increased risk for adverse outcomes, including persistent thrombi, recurrent embolism, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), and death. Anticoagulation protects against recurrence, which has a high mortality rate. The recommended duration of anticoagulation for patients with reversible PE risk factors is 3 months. For patients with idiopathic PE or persistent risk factors, extended duration of anticoagulation is preferred, balanced with an individual patient's risk of hemorrhage, which in itself is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Among patients with malignancy who develop venous thromboembolism (VTE), low-molecular-weight heparin is preferred over oral vitamin K antagonists in the first 6 months. Thereafter, anticoagulation should be continued indefinitely with either low-molecular-weight heparin or oral vitamin K antagonists. Inferior vena cava filters are not routinely recommended and should only be used in patients who have a contraindication to anticoagulation. Patients who have had VTE and with persistent or recurrent dyspnea should be evaluated for recurrence of VTE or development of CTEPH. Patients with recurrent VTE should be anticoagulated indefinitely. Routine screening for CTEPH in asymptomatic patients is not recommended. Echocardiography often provides the first indication of the presence of pulmonary hypertension. Once presence of CTEPH is established by right-sided heart catheterization and perfusion imaging (ie, ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy, computed tomography angiography, or pulmonary angiography), patients should be referred early to a center with expertise, as it is potentially surgically curable by pulmonary endarterectomy. Those who are deemed inoperable after being evaluated may gain symptomatic benefit from drugs approved for idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Lung transplantation may also be an option for patients who are not candidates for pulmonary endarterectomy.

PMID: 21881392 [PubMed - in process]

The Timing, Extent, Progression and Regression of Deep Vein Thrombosis in Immobile Stroke Patients: observational Data from the CLOTS Multicentre Randomised Trials.

The Timing, Extent, Progression and Regression of Deep Vein Thrombosis in Immobile Stroke Patients: observational Data from the CLOTS Multicentre Randomised Trials.

J Thromb Haemost. 2011 Aug 23;

Authors: Dennis M, Mordi N, Graham C, Sandercock P

Abstract
Background: Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) is an important complication of stroke but the evidence to support commonly used prophylactic strategies is conflicting. Objectives: To describe the incidence, extent, associated clinical features and evolution of DVT after stroke. Patients/Methods: The CLOTS trials 1 & 2 together randomised 5632 immobile stroke patients in 135 hospitals in nine countries. We screened patients for asymptomatic DVT with compression duplex ultrasound (CDU) at about 7-10 days and again at about 25-30 days after enrolment. Results: 641(11.4%) of 5632 patients had DVT detected on the first CDU at a median of 8(IQR 7-10) days after enrolment and an additional 176(3.1%) had a DVT on the second CDU at a median of 28(IQR 26-30) days. Of the 817 with DVTs, 289(35%) were symptomatic and 39(5%) had pulmonary embolism (PE) confirmed by imaging. 676 (83%) were unilateral, 141(17%) were bilateral, 322(39%) were limited to calf veins, 172(21%) were popliteal and 323(40%) were femoral. Of the 542 patients with DVT and a weak leg, the DVT affected the weaker leg in 396(73%), the stronger leg in 59(11%) and were bilateral in 87(16%). Of the 318 patients with a DVT detected on the first CDU who had a second scan, their DVT regressed in 148(47%), stayed the same in 140(44%) and progressed in just 30(9%). Conclusions: Although most DVTs develop within the 1(st) week, some develop later and some early DVTs progress. Any prophylaxis needs to be started early but ideally continued for at least 4 weeks.

PMID: 21883879 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Massive and Submassive Pulmonary Embolism: Experience With an Algorithm for Catheter-Directed Mechanical Thrombectomy.

Massive and Submassive Pulmonary Embolism: Experience With an Algorithm for Catheter-Directed Mechanical Thrombectomy.

Ann Vasc Surg. 2011 Aug 30;

Authors: Nassiri N, Jain A, McPhee D, Mina B, Rosen RJ, Giangola G, Carroccio A, Green RM

Abstract
BACKGROUND: The role of catheter-directed mechanical thrombectomy (CDMT) for the treatment of massive pulmonary embolism (MPE) and submassive pulmonary embolism (SMPE) is not clearly defined. We report our experience with an algorithm for CDMT as a primary treatment in patients with MPE and SMPE. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our experience in treating MPE and SMPE in consecutive patients over a 2-year period (2008-2010). Patients with computed tomography angiography evidence of saddle, main branch, or ≥2 lobar pulmonary emboli in the setting of hypoxia, tachycardia, echocardiographic right heart strain, and/or cardiogenic shock underwent AngioJet CDMT, with or without adjunctive thrombolytic power-pulse spray. Outcomes, including angiographic success, clinical improvement, complications, and survival to discharge, were evaluated. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (8 men, 7 women; 14 SMPE, 1 SMPE) with a mean age of 59 years (range: 35-90 years) were treated for heart strain (100%), tachycardia (67%), hypoxia (67%), and cardiogenic shock (7%). Ten patients (67%) also received Alteplase power-pulse spray. Resolution of symptoms and improvement in heart strain were achieved in all patients. There were no in-hospital mortalities. Complications occurred in 3 patients (20%), including 2 patients with acute tubular necrosis and 1 patient with an intraoperative cardiac arrest. Average hospitalization was 9 days (range: 4-26 days). All patients were discharged on full anticoagulation. None required supplemental oxygen at discharge. CONCLUSION: CDMT as primary treatment of MPE and SMPE has a high rate of technical and clinical success in a high-risk patient population. Experience and strict patient selection criteria may improve therapeutic outcomes.

PMID: 21885244 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Diagnosis and management of venous thromboembolism: an update a decade into the new millennium.

Venous thromboembolism refers to thrombotic events in the venous system that are most commonly manifested as deep vein thromboses in the upper or lower extremity and/or pulmonary embolism. Venous thromboembolism is a common disorder that is associated with significant mortality, morbidity and health care-related cost. An array of hereditary and acquired risk factors are associated with venous thromboembolism.

In recent years, a number of pivotal studies have expanded our understanding of the pathophysiology of venous thromboembolism, and served as the basis for evidence-based guidelines on prevention, diagnosis and treatment of venous thromboembolism. Furthermore, several novel therapeutic agents with different pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety profiles have recently become available for treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism.

The purpose of the current paper is to review the pathogenesis and epidemiology of venous thromboembolism as well as an evidence-based approach to the diagnosis and management of venous thromboembolism.

Search