Login to your account

Username *
Password *
Remember Me

Blog With Right Sidebar

    Vous êtes ici :  
  1. Accueil
  2. Blog With Right Sidebar

Smoking Prevention and Cessation in the Africa and Middle East Region: A Consensus Draft Guideline for Healthcare Providers – Executive Summary

Despite the abundance of scientific evidence confirming the health consequences of smoking and other forms of tobacco use, the tobacco epidemic remains an important public health problem and by 2030 it is predicted that more than 80% of tobacco deaths will be in developing countries.

In Africa and the Middle East, many local factors contribute to the initiation and maintenance of tobacco use. Although efforts to reduce the mortality and morbidity associated with smoking and tobacco dependence are underway, there is a need for guidance on how to utilize appropriate tobacco control policies and psychology- and pharmacology-based therapies to counter tobacco dependence as recommended by the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC). A group of tobacco cessation experts from public health services and/or academic institutions in Africa and the Middle East participated in a series of four meetings held in Cairo, Cape Town, and Dubai between May 2008 and February 2011 to develop a draft guideline tailored to their region.

This article provides the background to the development of this draft smoking cessation guideline and discusses how the recommendations can be implemented and progress monitored to promote both primary prevention and cessation of tobacco use within our countries. The draft guideline for Africa and the Middle East provides an important resource in combating the devastating effects of tobacco use in these regions which can be further localized through engagement with local stakeholders in the countries of the region.

Both Pulmonary and Extra-Pulmonary Factors Predict the Development of Disability in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Background: Although chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major cause of disability worldwide, its determinants remain poorly defined.

Objective: We hypothesized that both pulmonary and extra-pulmonary factors would predict prospective disablement across a hierarchy of activities in persons with COPD.

Methods: Six hundred and nine participants were studied at baseline (T0) and 2.5 years later (T1). The Valued Life Activities (VLA) scale quantified disability (10-point scale: 0 = no difficulty and 10 = unable to perform), defining disability as any activity newly rated ‘unable to perform’ at T1. Predictors included pulmonary (lung function, 6-minute walk distance and COPD severity score) and extra-pulmonary (quadriceps strength and lower extremity function) factors. Prospective disability risk was tested by separate logistic regression models for each predictor (baseline value and its change, T0–T1; odds ratios were scaled at 1 standard deviation per factor. Incident disability across a hierarchy of obligatory, committed and discretionary VLA subscales was compared.

Results: Subjects manifested a 40% or greater increased odds of developing disability for each predictor (baseline and change over time). Disability in discretionary activities developed at a rate 2.2-times higher than observed in committed activities, which was in turn 2.5-times higher than the rate observed in obligatory activities (p < 0.05 for each level).

Conclusions: Disability is common in COPD. Both pulmonary and extra-pulmonary factors are important in predicting its development.

Effect of combination treatment on lung volumes and exercise endurance time in COPD

Publication year: 2012
Source:Respiratory Medicine

Helgo Magnussen, Pierluigi Paggiaro, Hendrik Schmidt, Steven Kesten, Norbert Metzdorf, François Maltais

Background Data comparing two bronchodilators vs. one bronchodilator plus inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) on hyperinflation and exercise endurance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are scarce, though these therapeutic strategies are widely used in clinical practice. Methods We performed a randomized, crossover clinical trial of two × 8 weeks comparing tiotropium (18 μg once daily) + salmeterol (50 μg twice daily) (T + S) to salmeterol + fluticasone (50/500 μg twice daily) (S + F) in COPD (forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) ≤65% predicted, and thoracic gas volume (TGV) ≥120% predicted). Coprimary endpoints were postbronchodilator TGV and exercise endurance time (EET). Results In 309 patients, at baseline, prebronchodilator FEV1 was 1.36 L (46% predicted), TGV was 5.42 L (165% predicted), and EET = 458 s. Relative to S + F, T + S lowered postdose TGV by 182 ± 44 ml after 4 weeks (p < 0.0001) and 87 ± 44 ml after 8 weeks (p < 0.05). EET was nonsignificantly increased following T + S treatment (20 ± 15 s at 4 weeks, 15 ± 13 s at 8 weeks) vs. S + F. BORG dyspnea score at exercise isotime was reduced in favor of T + S. Conclusion The two bronchodilators decreased hyperinflation significantly more than one bronchodilator and ICS. This difference was not reflected in EET. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00530842)




Diagnostic accuracy of primary care asthma/COPD working hypotheses, a real life study

Publication year: 2012
Source:Respiratory Medicine, Volume 106, Issue 8

Annelies E. Lucas, Frank J. Smeenk, Ivo J. Smeele, Onno P. van Schayck

Abstract Misdiagnoses are inevitable when working hypotheses of asthma/COPD of General Practitioners (GPs) are not checked by spirometry. To reduce misdiagnoses, Asthma/COPD-support services (AC-services) offer support by performing spirometry assessed together with written medical history by consulting pulmonologists. Research questions Which criteria do GPs use to justify their asthma/COPD working hypotheses? How do diagnostic assessments by an AC-service change GPs' working hypotheses? Do GPs' justifications for their working hypotheses influence the extent to which working hypotheses correspond with diagnoses given by an AC-service? Method We investigated the working hypotheses of 17 GPs for 284 patients with respiratory problems and their justifications: “clinical symptoms”, “office spirometry”, or “specialist's correspondence”. Working hypotheses were compared with diagnoses given by an AC-service, and the influence of the different justifications categories on diagnostic accuracy of the working hypotheses was described. Results 49% of the working hypothesis were only based on clinical information, 21% were also based on office spirometry. For 30% additional specialist information was available. 50% of the working hypotheses were confirmed by the AC-service. The working hypothesis asthma was confirmed more frequently (62%) than the working hypothesis COPD (40%). The justifications for the working hypotheses given by GPs did not influence these results. Conclusion Diagnostic assessments of the AC-service differed significantly from the working hypotheses of GPs, even when these were based on previous specialists' correspondence or on office spirometry. To optimize the diagnoses in primary care, diagnostic support of an AC-service is recommended for all primary care patients with respiratory problems.




Cognitive dysfunction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease – A systematic review

Publication year: 2012
Source:Respiratory Medicine, Volume 106, Issue 8

Lone Schou, Birte Østergaard, Lars S. Rasmussen, Susan Rydahl-Hansen, Klaus Phanareth

Background Substantial healthcare resources are spent on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In addition, the involvement of patients in monitoring and treatment of their condition has been suggested. However, it is important to maintain a view of self-care that takes differences in cognitive ability into account. The aim of this study was to determine the occurrence and severity of cognitive dysfunction in COPD patients, and to assess the association between severity of COPD and the level of cognitive function. Methods We conducted a systematic review, and a search in the following databases: Medline, PsychINFO, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CINAHL, and SweMed up to July 2010. The articles were included if 1 participants were patients with COPD, 2 relevant outcome was cognitive function investigated by a neuropsychological test battery, and 3 the severity of COPD had been assessed. Results Fifteen studies were included, involving 655 COPD patients and 394 controls. Cognitive function was impaired in COPD patients as compared to healthy controls, but the level of functioning was better than in patients with Alzheimer's disease. There was a significant association between severity of COPD, as measured by lung function and blood gases, and cognitive dysfunction, but only in patients with severe COPD. Conclusions Cognitive impairment can be detected in severe COPD patients, but the clinical relevance of the cognitive dysfunction is not yet known. Future studies should concentrate on the consequences of cognitive dysfunction for daily living in these patients, and solutions involving a high degree of self-care might require special support.




Search

Search